In a recent YouTube live session led by Dean Ellerby [MVP] alongside Andrew Taylor and Steven Weiner, the panel tackled the central question: when Intune goes wrong, how fast can you recover? The hosts shared practical recovery tactics, real-world examples, and tools that have proven effective across dozens of tenants and hundreds of admin hours. Moreover, the discussion framed common failures—such as unexpected policy changes, conditional access rules that lock out users, and silent setting drift—as everyday risks that many administrators face. Consequently, the session aimed to move beyond theory and give operations teams usable steps to reduce downtime and restore services quickly.
The presenters emphasized that most environments are built with good intentions, yet outages still happen because of human error, automation gaps, or platform quirks. They noted that administrators often waste time clicking through portal blades trying to pinpoint the problem, which increases helpdesk ticket volume and audit complexity. Therefore, the session focused on detection, rollback, and tooling that shorten the mean time to repair. As a result, IT teams can leave with concrete ideas rather than general warnings.
Notably, the video highlighted recent platform updates that materially speed recovery, starting with Windows 11 Quick Machine Recovery, introduced in version 24H2. This feature can automatically detect restart failures and apply fixes, which the speakers said reduces restart failure rates and cuts resolution steps for admins. In addition, the panel covered Windows 365 Disaster Recovery Plus, a cloud-based service for Cloud PCs that promises recovery time objectives under 30 minutes for many tenants, improving on traditional cross-region recovery times.
On macOS, the presenters discussed the integration of LAPS (Local Admin Password Solution) with automated device enrollment, which simplifies helpdesk access by rotating encrypted local admin passwords. Furthermore, they explained that centralized monitoring of device encryption—such as BitLocker for Windows and FileVault for macOS—gives admins one place to retrieve recovery keys and understand device states. However, the session also noted that reporting can lag due to OS check-in cycles, so recovery expectations should account for those delays.
The panelists recommended several hands-on tactics that work in live incidents, beginning with tighter change control and automated drift detection to prevent unexpected policy shifts. For example, they advised using scripted audits and scheduled comparisons to detect configuration drift before it affects users, which in turn reduces the number of urgent helpdesk tickets. Additionally, the speakers suggested maintaining a small set of verified rollback artifacts or templates that can be applied quickly to restore previous configurations.
Moreover, the session covered operational tools and workflows, including how to leverage Tenant Manager to support multi-tenant visibility and coordinated responses across environments. They also recommended clear runbooks for common outage scenarios, with roles and escalation paths defined so that recovery steps are not reinvented under stress. Finally, live Q&A emphasized the value of practicing incident drills so teams become familiar with the tools and time expectations involved.
While automation and centralized tools can accelerate recovery, the panel warned about important tradeoffs between speed and control. Automated fixes can resolve many routine issues quickly, but they may also obscure root causes if logging and auditing are not comprehensive, which complicates post-incident reviews. Therefore, organizations must balance aggressive remediation with preserving forensic data for audits and insurers.
Another challenge discussed was platform variability: recovery behavior differs across Windows, macOS, and Cloud PC environments, so a one-size-fits-all playbook will fall short. Reporting latency and device check-in cycles can delay remediation on some devices, and cross-region recovery for very large estates can still take longer than cloud-first messaging suggests. Consequently, the speakers urged teams to measure recovery times empirically for their specific tenant size and device mix rather than relying solely on vendor benchmarks.
In summary, Dean Ellerby [MVP] and his co-presenters delivered an actionable set of practices that blend automation with disciplined change control and clear runbooks for incident response. They encouraged teams to instrument their environments for drift detection, to preserve audit trails during remediation, and to rehearse the most likely outage scenarios so that roles and tools are familiar under pressure. By doing so, organizations can reduce mean time to recover and avoid many of the common pitfalls the panel described.
Ultimately, the video framed recovery as a combination of technology, process, and practice: recent platform features like Windows 11 Quick Machine Recovery and Windows 365 Disaster Recovery Plus help a great deal, but success depends on realistic tradeoffs and disciplined operations. For editorial readers, the session offered both strategic guidance and tactical steps that can be put into practice immediately to make Intune environments more resilient and easier to restore when something goes wrong.
Intune recovery time, Intune disaster recovery plan, recover Intune after outage, Intune backup and restore, restore Intune configurations, troubleshoot Intune quickly, how fast can you recover Intune, Intune incident response