No-Faffing Managed IT Support & Cyber Security Support. Made in Yorkshire, built for the UK.
Jonathan Edwards released a YouTube video that examines the new Microsoft 365 Defender Suite add-on for Microsoft 365 Business Premium, asking whether the extra $10 per user per month delivers real value. In this news-style summary, we cover the video’s key claims, explain the suite’s components in plain language, and weigh the tradeoffs small and midsize businesses face. Moreover, we place the update in the broader context of rising cyber threats and shifting licensing models.
The video outlines that the add-on bundles several Plan 2 products to provide a layered defense across devices, email, identity, and cloud apps. In particular, it highlights Defender for Endpoint Plan 2, Defender for Office 365 Plan 2, Defender for Identity, Defender for Cloud Apps, and Entra ID Plan 2. Consequently, the bundle aims to give SMBs access to enterprise-grade features that were once harder to obtain without buying multiple licenses.
First, the video stresses that integration is a major selling point because the tools share telemetry and automated responses across attack surfaces, which improves detection and response speed. Additionally, putting these capabilities under a single add-on can simplify security management and reduce the administrative overhead of piecing together separate products. Therefore, for teams with limited security staff, the unified portal and coordinated alerts can be especially useful.
However, the $10 per user monthly price introduces tradeoffs that the video makes clear: although it is cheaper than buying each component separately, the add-on requires tenant-wide licensing to unlock some Plan 2 features. As a result, smaller organizations must decide whether to upgrade every account or accept mixed protection levels, which can create coverage gaps. Furthermore, the recurring cost may still be a barrier for businesses with strict budgets, especially when weighed against other IT priorities.
The video also discusses deployment hurdles, noting that organizations with diverse device fleets and third-party apps may face complexity when enforcing consistent policies. Moreover, integrating identity protection and conditional access via Entra ID Plan 2 can surface legacy dependencies, requiring careful planning and sometimes additional configuration work. Consequently, IT teams should budget time and resources for testing, rollouts, and staff training to ensure the new tools work as intended.
On the one hand, the suite raises the baseline security posture by covering email phishing, endpoint threats, and risky cloud app usage, which is important as threats grow more sophisticated. On the other hand, adding advanced telemetry and automated responses increases the volume of alerts and may demand new processes for triage and incident response. Thus, organizations must balance improved detection with the operational load of managing more signals.
Jonathan emphasizes that the suite can help secure AI tool deployments, such as Copilot, by enforcing data loss prevention and access controls around sensitive content. Consequently, organizations that plan to adopt AI assistants may find the add-on useful to maintain governance and reduce accidental exposure. Nevertheless, the video warns that no single product eliminates all risks, so robust policies and user training remain essential.
Importantly, the video clarifies that Microsoft 365 Business Premium already includes foundational protections that suit many smaller teams, especially those with minimal regulatory demands. Therefore, businesses with straightforward needs and tight budgets might choose to stick with the existing plan while monitoring risk. However, those facing targeted attacks, compliance obligations, or rapid cloud adoption should consider upgrading for stronger, integrated safeguards.
Ultimately, the video frames the decision as a cost-benefit judgment: pay $10 per user for broader, enterprise-grade security, or accept the incremental risk and operational simplicity of the current plan. The presenter argues that organizations with limited security staff or those handling sensitive data will likely see the add-on as a worthwhile investment. Conversely, very small operations with minimal exposure might delay the upgrade until threats or business needs change.
Jonathan concludes that the Microsoft 365 Defender Suite is compelling for many SMBs, but not universally necessary; it depends on risk tolerance, compliance needs, and available IT resources. Therefore, he recommends conducting a gap analysis, piloting the tools on a subset of users, and planning for the tenant-wide implications before committing. In addition, he advises budgeting for training and integrating the suite into existing incident response plans.
In summary, the video presents a balanced view: the add-on delivers meaningful security gains at a modest price, yet it brings licensing and operational tradeoffs that require careful evaluation. Consequently, businesses should weigh their exposure, readiness to manage more advanced tools, and the cost of potential incidents against the subscription fee. With that assessment, organizations can make an informed choice about whether the $10 per user investment aligns with their security strategy.
Microsoft 365 Defender review, Microsoft 365 Defender pricing, Microsoft Defender Suite cost per user, Is Microsoft 365 Defender worth it, M365 Defender features and benefits, Microsoft 365 security suite comparison, Defender for Business vs Microsoft 365 E5, Pay extra for Microsoft Defender worth it