Power Apps: Figma Design Kit Explained

Key insights

• Figma Design Kit: Lukas Pavelka’s plugin links Figma directly to Power Apps so designers can build pixel-accurate screens and export them into app projects quickly.
  It lets teams keep visual consistency while avoiding manual rebuilds in Power Apps.
• Power Apps integration: The tool exports Figma screens to a format you can paste into Power Apps, maps control types (buttons, galleries, screens), and can import screens back into Figma while preserving relationships.
  This streamlines handoff and reduces conversion errors.
• YAML export: Exporting to YAML creates readable, portable definitions for screens and components that developers can paste or automate into Power Apps.
  YAML improves reproducibility and supports workflow automation.
• Component libraries: The kit supports reusable components, shared themes, and consistent color/fonts so teams scale UIs across apps without design drift.
  Reuse speeds development and keeps enterprise apps visually consistent.
• Designer-friendly: No prior Power Platform experience is required—designers can work in Figma and makers can convert those designs into functioning canvas apps.
  Examples shown include a nutrition tracker and scalable HR solutions to prove real-world readiness.
• Roadmap (DesignKit v4): Upcoming features include multi-screen export, improved font parity with Figma, and better documentation export to support larger projects and team collaboration.
  These upgrades aim to tighten the design-to-development loop for larger, enterprise apps.

Video release and context

Microsoft published a YouTube video that features Lukas Pavelka, the creator of the DesignKit for Power Apps, in the second episode of the series. The episode explores how designers and makers can work together to build polished apps by connecting Figma designs to the Power Platform. Moreover, the host highlights practical demos, including a nutrition tracker and enterprise HR scenarios that show real-world use. Consequently, the video aims to make the design-to-app workflow more approachable for teams with different skill sets.

What the demo shows

In the demonstration, Pavelka walks through exporting a Figma screen into a YAML format and then pasting the generated snippets into Power Apps. He also maps common control types such as buttons, galleries, and screens so that designers do not have to recreate elements manually. Furthermore, the demo shows how themes and color palettes move from design files into running canvas apps, which helps maintain visual consistency. This hands-on approach underscores how the tool reduces errors and saves developer time.

Key features of DesignKit

DesignKit 3.5 supports two-way translation between Figma and Power Apps, allowing import and export of screens while preserving component relationships. Additionally, the plugin handles component reuse so that once a designer updates a component in Figma, makers can carry those updates into their apps more easily. Pavelka also highlights control prefix mapping and improved handling of typography, which aim to reduce mismatches between design intent and runtime appearance. As a result, teams can iterate faster without losing fidelity during handoff.

Why this matters for teams

This integration bridges the familiar design workflow in Figma with the low-code development experience of Power Apps, and therefore it lowers friction between designers and citizen developers. Consequently, designers can produce richer, more consistent user interfaces while makers focus on logic and data, which improves overall app quality. Moreover, organizations see benefits in speed and collaboration because fewer manual conversions cut down on repetitive tasks. Thus, the tool helps align visual design and functional delivery across project phases.

Tradeoffs and technical challenges

Despite clear benefits, teams must weigh tradeoffs between visual fidelity and runtime constraints inside Power Apps. For example, not every font or layout that works in Figma maps perfectly into a canvas app, so designers and makers must compromise on typography and spacing at times. Additionally, multi-screen projects increase complexity; exporting many screens requires good organization and careful dependency management to avoid broken links or mismatched components. Therefore, teams should adopt disciplined naming, version control, and shared design libraries to reduce integration friction.

Scalability and enterprise considerations

Pavelka demonstrates enterprise-ready scenarios such as HR solutions, where reuse and governance matter a great deal for large deployments. In these cases, scalability depends on consistent component libraries and clear documentation so that different teams can apply the same patterns. However, larger projects must also solve operational concerns like performance, licensing, and maintainability when they move dozens of screens and complex interactions into live apps. Consequently, organizations should plan for testing, governance, and incremental rollouts as they adopt the integration at scale.

Future directions and expected improvements

Looking ahead, Pavelka mentions plans for a forthcoming version that aims to support multi-screen exports and closer font parity, which would reduce the need for manual adjustments. Moreover, improved documentation export could help teams capture project knowledge more reliably and speed onboarding. Nevertheless, these enhancements will require careful handling of differences between the design tool and the runtime environment to avoid introducing new complexity. Finally, continued development should focus on balancing richer feature parity with predictable, maintainable outputs for production apps.

Practical steps to get started

The video also outlines pragmatic first steps: use the provided design kit, try simple exports to learn the mapping rules, and iterate on a small app before scaling to enterprise projects. Additionally, teams should align designers and makers around shared component libraries and naming conventions to prevent confusion when importing screens. Moreover, early collaboration encourages designers to consider runtime constraints and helps makers plan for reusable components. Consequently, an incremental approach reduces risk and accelerates adoption within organizations.

Community and support

Microsoft and the Power Platform community offer resources and forums where practitioners can discuss patterns and troubleshoot common issues, which helps teams learn faster. Therefore, new users benefit from community examples, templates, and practical tips that address real integration problems. Nevertheless, teams should remain cautious about applying community solutions blindly and instead adapt them to internal governance and security rules. In this way, community input complements formal documentation while keeping projects aligned with organizational standards.

Conclusion

The Microsoft video featuring Lukas Pavelka highlights a tangible step toward better design-development collaboration by connecting Figma and Power Apps via DesignKit. It demonstrates clear improvements in speed and fidelity for app creation, yet it also emphasizes practical tradeoffs such as font parity, complexity in multi-screen projects, and governance needs for larger teams. Consequently, teams that plan, standardize, and iterate can gain substantial benefits while managing the inherent challenges. Overall, the episode offers a useful roadmap for designers and makers who want to deliver more polished and consistent low-code applications.

Keywords

Figma design kit for Power Apps, Lukas Pavelka Figma Power Apps, Power Apps design system, Figma to Power Apps conversion, Power Apps UI kit Figma, Figma components for Power Apps, Power Apps prototyping with Figma, Power Apps design kit tutorial