Copilot Connectors: Federated vs Synced

Key insights

• Source: Summary of a YouTube video explaining the General Availability of Copilot Connectors and the new distinction between federated and synced connectors.
  These notes are prepared by an editor and are not the original author’s words.
• What are Copilot Connectors: Connectors link external systems into Microsoft 365 Copilot so AI can search and reason over outside data.
  They respect tenant permissions, use encryption, and stay under organizational governance.
• Federated connectors: Query external systems in real time without storing data in Microsoft 365.
  They keep data fresh but can show higher latency and depend on the source’s availability.
• Synced connectors: Periodically ingest and index external content into Microsoft Graph for faster responses.
  They deliver quick results for searches but may lag behind live changes due to sync schedules.
• Admin setup and controls: Admins configure connectors in the Microsoft 365 admin center and can scope data and attributes via Copilot Studio.
  Use filters, schedules, and access controls to balance performance, privacy, and cost.
• When to choose which: Use federated connectors for live operational queries (alerts, current tickets).
  Use synced connectors for broad, fast search across historical content; be aware of sync limits, publishing delays, and API latency when planning deployments.

Introduction

In a recent YouTube video, Nick DeCourcy of Bright Ideas Agency unpacks the arrival of new Microsoft Copilot connectors and explains the growing distinction between federated connectors and synced connectors. He outlines how these integrations extend Microsoft 365 Copilot into external systems and why administrators and users must rethink design choices. Consequently, the video serves as a practical primer for teams deciding how to bring external data into their Copilot and search experiences.

What Copilot Connectors Do

DeCourcy describes Copilot connectors as integrations that let Copilot query or index data that lives outside of Microsoft 365, such as ticketing systems, project boards, and developer tools. He explains that connectors bridge fragmented enterprise data so Copilot can reason across a broader set of content while still respecting permissions and tenant controls. Therefore, connectors help make external content discoverable inside Copilot chat and search without forcing a full migration of systems.

How Federated and Synced Connectors Work

According to DeCourcy, federated connectors run live queries against external APIs and return results on demand, which means they do not store the external data inside Microsoft 365. As a result, federated connectors keep data fresh and minimize storage duplication, but they can introduce latency because each request depends on the external system's response. Additionally, federated connectors often rely on the external service's availability and API rate limits, so administrators must plan for variable response times.

By contrast, synced connectors ingest and index external content into Microsoft Graph on a schedule, providing faster responses to user queries because data already resides inside the Microsoft environment. Consequently, synced connectors favor scenarios where low-latency search and broad analytical scope matter more than instant freshness. However, they require more setup and configuration, including sync schedules, filters, and periodic maintenance to ensure the indexed data remains relevant.

Tradeoffs and Practical Use Cases

DeCourcy highlights tradeoffs that teams face when choosing between federated and synced approaches. For example, operational scenarios like checking a live ticket status often benefit from federated connectors because they show the current state, whereas broad search across historical artifacts typically favors synced connectors for speed and completeness. Thus, organizations may adopt a hybrid approach, using federated connectors for highly dynamic systems and synced connectors for large, static repositories.

Moreover, the speaker urges readers to weigh the cost of complexity against user experience. While federated connectors reduce storage concerns, they can complicate query routing and increase dependency on third-party APIs. Conversely, synced connectors simplify runtime performance but add ingestion overhead and the need for governance to manage which content becomes indexed.

Implementation Challenges for IT and Admins

DeCourcy also covers practical obstacles that IT teams will face during deployment. Authentication and permissions are central issues because connectors must respect existing access controls while enabling Copilot to query or index data, which often requires careful configuration and least-privilege assignments. Consequently, setting up the right scopes and consent models takes time and testing to avoid accidental overexposure of sensitive information.

Additionally, operational limits and management policies can constrain how much content you can ingest and how frequently you can sync. Therefore, admins should plan for throttling, backoff strategies, and monitoring to detect failures or delayed updates. Finally, debugging federated queries can be harder than diagnosing synced-index problems because federated responses depend on external system stability and API behavior.

Security, Compliance, and Governance Considerations

Security receives strong emphasis in the video, where DeCourcy reminds viewers that connectors must align with organizational compliance rules and data residency requirements. Because synced connectors store copies of data within Microsoft 365, they require additional governance to control indexing, retention, and access. Consequently, teams must use encryption, logging, and policy controls to minimize exposure and meet regulatory needs.

At the same time, federated connectors reduce the footprint of copied data but do not eliminate governance needs since queries still return external content into the Copilot experience. Thus, administrators should implement consistent access reviews, audit trails, and usage monitoring regardless of connector type to maintain a secure posture.

Conclusion

Overall, DeCourcy’s video offers a clear comparison of federated connectors and synced connectors, and it helps readers make practical choices based on performance, freshness, and governance tradeoffs. While no single approach fits every scenario, the guidance encourages a balanced strategy that matches connector type to workload needs and security constraints. For organizations planning Copilot adoption, the key takeaway is to design connector architectures deliberately, test them thoroughly, and monitor them continuously to get the intended benefits without unwanted surprises.

Keywords

Copilot connectors, federated connectors, synced connectors, Copilot connector comparison, Microsoft Copilot connectors, federated vs synced connectors, Copilot data integration, enterprise Copilot connectors