MSP Pricing: Why Undervaluing Costs

Key insights

• Core claim: The video argues that charging less than £40 per user per month for a full Microsoft 365 managed service usually loses money because essential work gets quietly skipped.
  Underpricing hides the true cost of a properly managed environment and creates service gaps.
• Key managed tasks: Proper Microsoft 365 management includes Conditional Access, Entra ID hardening, Intune, Defender, Secure Score, DLP, and ongoing Compliance work.
  These tasks require continuous effort and tooling month after month, per client.
• Why low pricing fails: Low fees often force reactive support instead of proactive management, reduce monitoring, and cut staffing or tooling budgets.
  That increases the risk of costly incidents and downtime, which can erase any apparent savings.
• Hidden costs for customers: Underpricing can create surprise fees, more outages, and extra internal effort for the client, leading to a higher total cost of ownership.
  Buying on price alone often overlooks these long-term impacts.
• Client communication: If clients say “won’t pay more,” the root problem is often value visibility — you must show value and demonstrate what good looks like with clear reports and baselines.
  Explaining concrete security posture and risk reductions helps justify sustainable pricing.
• Practical actions now: Audit pricing and scope to match your real delivery costs, produce a baseline security report (for Conditional Access and core controls), and use a maturity scorecard to set realistic, client-specific pricing.
  These steps help protect margins and deliver predictable, secure service.

Video overview and central claim

In a recent YouTube video, Jonathan Edwards lays out a clear and direct warning for managed service providers: charging less than £40 per user per month for a full Microsoft 365 managed service usually means crucial work is being skipped. He argues that the problem is not only pricing mechanics but the quiet erosion of necessary tasks, such as security hardening and ongoing compliance. As a result, providers that appear inexpensive can produce higher total cost and risk for clients over time. This video mixes practical examples with a frank business reality check to help MSPs understand what sustainable delivery truly costs.

Edwards frames the discussion around concrete operational activities and their monthly effort, rather than abstract pricing models. He names specific technologies and responsibilities—like Conditional Access, Entra ID hardening, Intune, Defender, Secure Score, DLP, and broader Compliance work—and explains that each requires sustained attention. Consequently, his point is that a low per-user fee often implies those tasks are omitted or performed only when problems appear. Therefore, the video presses MSPs to reconcile their price with the work they promise to deliver.

What goes into the true cost of service

The video breaks the true cost into several ongoing components, starting with staff time for monitoring and incident response and extending to licensing and security tooling. Edwards explains that automated alerts, policy tuning, and remediation all consume recurring hours, and that third-party tool costs and vendor price increases further raise the baseline. Moreover, he reminds viewers that the cost of even short outages or security incidents can quickly erase any apparent savings from low monthly fees. Thus, a realistic price must reflect continuous prevention work as well as occasional remediation.

He also highlights the hidden overheads that many MSPs under-estimate: documentation, client reporting, audit preparation, and regular policy reviews. These tasks seldom show up in ticket counts but are essential to sustained security and compliance. When providers skimp on them to meet a low price point, clients face accumulated technical debt and higher long-term risk. In short, the monthly invoice should capture both visible support and invisible maintenance that prevents larger failures.

Why clients “won’t pay more” is only part of the story

Edwards tackles the common objection—“my clients won’t pay more”—and reframes it as a communication problem rather than a purely market one. He suggests that many clients simply have not seen a clear demonstration of what comprehensive protection looks like, or what the consequences are of not having it. By showing baselines, risk indicators, and the cost of incidents, MSPs can build a better value conversation rather than competing solely on price. Therefore, transparent reporting and staged upgrades can shift buyers from short-term thinking to total-cost awareness.

At the same time, Edwards acknowledges the real sales challenge: buyers do comparison shopping on a per-user line item, and procurement often prioritizes the lowest monthly number. This forces MSPs to choose between competing on price or reinventing how they present value through education and case studies. The tradeoff is clear: invest in client conversations and risk demonstrating higher fees, or accept thinner margins and the operational shortcuts that follow. Either path demands hard choices about service scope and sustainability.

Operational tradeoffs and common challenges

The video explores operational choices MSPs face when margins tighten, such as relying on offshore support, reducing monitoring coverage, or limiting policy enforcement. Each approach has pros and cons: offshore teams may lower costs but can increase communication friction, while narrower monitoring reduces immediate expense but raises detection latency. Edwards stresses that automation helps but cannot fully replace skilled staff who interpret alerts and tune protections. Thus, MSPs must balance cost control with the risk of degraded service and delayed response.

Tool inflation and compliance complexity create further pressure. Vendors raising prices or new regulatory requirements increase the baseline cost of delivering secure, compliant services. Edwards points out that some MSPs respond by pushing compliance tasks into separate projects or fees, but that tactic risks surprising clients later and eroding trust. Consequently, a durable pricing model must account for evolving vendor and regulatory landscapes while remaining clear to customers.

Practical takeaways for MSPs and buyers

Edwards ends with actionable steps: reassess pricing to reflect continuous security and compliance work, present clear baselines so clients understand what they get, and offer tiered services that separate essential managed activities from optional extras. He recommends demonstrating the real cost of incidents and showing how proactive management reduces long-term expenses, which helps justify higher, sustainable fees. In this way, MSPs can protect margins while improving client outcomes.

For buyers, the video advises looking beyond headline per-user prices and asking detailed questions about monitoring, remediation SLAs, reporting cadence, and how compliance work is handled. While higher fees may seem like a harder sell, Edwards argues they often deliver lower total cost of ownership through fewer incidents and less operational disruption. Ultimately, the video encourages both MSPs and customers to move from price-focused conversations to value-focused partnerships.

Jonathan Edwards’ message is a practical reminder that sustainable managed services require clear scope, transparent value, and pricing that matches effort. His YouTube presentation challenges MSPs to either raise their service standards or price honestly for the work they must do. As the market matures, the firms that align price with true, ongoing delivery will likely build more durable client relationships and fewer surprise costs for everyone involved.

Keywords

MSP pricing strategy, managed services pricing, MSP profit margins, value-based pricing for MSPs, why MSPs should charge more, MSP pricing mistakes, pricing models for MSPs, how to price MSP services