SharePoint: What Site Collection Means

Key insights

• Summary of the YouTube video: the presenter explains that the old meaning of site collection (a top-level site with subsites) has shifted in modern SharePoint, and recommends thinking in terms of a flat architecture connected by hub sites.
  
• Why subsites are discouraged: deep hierarchies cause migration, performance, and governance problems; modern sites stay independent so you avoid those limits and simplify administration.
  
• What hub sites do: they group independent sites to share navigation, themes, and search scope without forcing shared permissions or physical containment.
  
• Design guidance: create a separate site per workload (teams, projects, or departments) and associate them to hubs for consistent branding and search while keeping permissions granular.
  
• Modern information architecture: use metadata-driven information architecture instead of folders, publish content with modern templates and Pages, and integrate with Teams and Microsoft 365 features for better discovery.
  
• Practical benefits: this approach improves scalability, eases migration to Microsoft 365, reduces permission conflicts, and speeds feature rollouts—so plan sites and hubs before you clean up or build your environment.
  

SharePoint Maven Inc published a clear and practical YouTube video that aims to simplify a confusing piece of SharePoint terminology: the difference between a site and a site collection in modern Microsoft 365. The video argues that the old meaning of site collection no longer matches how organizations build in Microsoft 365, and it explains how Microsoft’s cloud-first changes favor a different approach. Consequently, the presentation focuses on concrete guidance for architects and administrators who must redesign environments or clean up legacy structures.

Video overview and its purpose

The video begins by contrasting the classic SharePoint model with modern SharePoint Online, and it uses simple examples to show why the term site collection can mislead people today. It explains that in classic SharePoint a single top-level site contained nested subsites, whereas in modern SharePoint each Team Site or Communication Site behaves like its own independent container. Therefore, the presenter urges teams to stop using the old mental model and to adopt a flatter architecture supported by Microsoft 365 features.

Furthermore, SharePoint Maven Inc highlights how features like Teams, search, and Copilot integrate with modern sites in a way that makes deep nesting unnecessary. The video also points out that hub sites now provide shared navigation, branding, and rollups without enforcing the old hierarchical boundaries. As a result, viewers receive a practical map for transitioning from legacy setups to more scalable designs.

Key changes in modern SharePoint

First, the video clarifies that modern SharePoint favors a flat architecture, where each new Team or Communication Site operates independently rather than as a child under a larger site tree. This model simplifies permissions and reduces inheritance problems because each site stands alone and connects to hubs when needed. Next, the presenter explains that hub sites serve as logical groupings, supplying consistent navigation and shared metadata without merging security or storage boundaries.

In addition, SharePoint Maven Inc emphasizes that subsites are now discouraged because they create complexity during migrations and governance. The video explains that modern site templates put content into pages and libraries designed for dynamic views based on metadata rather than folder hierarchies. Consequently, organizations gain more flexible content surfacing across Teams, Viva, and search by using independent sites tied together via hubs.

Benefits of adopting the modern model

According to the video, the modern approach improves scalability and performance because sites are not limited by deep nesting or rigid database scopes, and administrators can manage capacity more predictably. Moreover, independent sites make it easier to set granular permissions and to share externally when needed, since security boundaries remain clear and isolated. Finally, integration with Microsoft 365 groups, automatic branding through hubs, and quicker feature rollouts enhance the user experience and reduce administrative overhead.

SharePoint Maven Inc also notes that this design supports migration readiness, making it simpler to move from on-premises SharePoint Server to Microsoft 365. By moving away from subsites, organizations avoid complicated cleanup during migration and reduce the risk of broken links or inherited permission errors. Thus, teams often see fewer conflicts and faster adoption when they embrace the flat pattern and hubs.

Tradeoffs and practical challenges

However, the video does not ignore tradeoffs: while a flat model improves flexibility, it can increase the number of sites to manage, which raises questions about naming, provisioning, and lifecycle policies. Consequently, organizations must design governance processes to handle site sprawl, including templates, automation, and clear ownership standards to prevent fragmentation. Additionally, teams may need to invest in training and tooling so users understand when to create a new site versus associating with an existing hub.

Another challenge the presenter discusses is metadata design: replacing folders with metadata requires thoughtful planning and user behavior change, and some groups resist that shift because it feels less familiar. Therefore, the video recommends incremental changes, pilots, and strong communication to help users adapt. In short, the flatter landscape simplifies many technical problems but shifts effort into governance and change management.

Guidance for architects and administrators

Finally, the video offers straightforward steps for teams preparing to adopt modern patterns, such as auditing existing sites, mapping business needs to site scope, and creating hub structures that reflect real workflows rather than legacy hierarchies. It encourages creating separate site collections for distinct workloads like departmental collaboration, customer projects, or public communications, and then connecting those sites to hubs for shared navigation and search. As a result, the design balances autonomy with consistent experience.

SharePoint Maven Inc closes by urging viewers to rethink language and practice: stop using site collection as a synonym for hierarchical boundaries and start thinking in terms of independent sites, hubs, and metadata-driven architecture. Overall, the video provides a pragmatic roadmap that explains tradeoffs, identifies challenges, and points teams toward cleaner, more maintainable SharePoint environments in Microsoft 365. Consequently, this guidance should help organizations reduce future headaches and design with modern cloud capabilities in mind.

Keywords

modern SharePoint site collection meaning, SharePoint site vs site collection, modern SharePoint terminology, hub sites vs site collections, replace site collection SharePoint, SharePoint architecture modern sites, SharePoint admin site collection guidance, modern SharePoint best practices