The latest YouTube video by Steve Corey explains Microsoft's new reporting capability for SharePoint agents, and it arrives as organizations increasingly rely on AI inside Microsoft 365. In the video, Corey walks viewers through the SharePoint Agent Insights report and demonstrates how administrators can surface which agents exist and what actions they perform. As a result, the update promises more transparency around agent activity while also raising questions about governance and operational tradeoffs. Overall, the video positions this report as a practical tool for admins who must balance usefulness with control.
Corey opens by showing the report interface and the basic filters that let administrators see agents by site and activity type. He then highlights hands-on actions available from the report, such as locating agent-enabled sites and assessing agent usage patterns. By illustrating real examples, the video makes clear how the report translates abstract agent activity into concrete insights that admins can act on. Consequently, viewers come away with a clear sense of how to find and evaluate agents within their own tenant.
Moreover, Corey explains how the report helps reveal agents that might otherwise operate in the background, interacting with documents and users. This visibility supports troubleshooting and helps teams identify where automated responses or summaries are being generated. Therefore, the report functions as both an inventory and a diagnostic tool, which is useful when assessing the impact of AI on content and collaboration. Still, administrators must learn how to interpret the data to avoid false positives or misleading conclusions.
The video highlights several reporting improvements, including detailed interaction logs, site-scoped views, and filters for agent-generated content quality. Corey emphasizes that these features make it easier to measure how agents influence user workflows and content delivery. In addition, the report surfaces metrics that can inform decisions about agent deployment and lifecycle management. Thus, teams can prioritize which agents to refine, retire, or expand based on observable usage.
Transitioning from basic visibility, Corey also points out integration with broader Microsoft 365 tooling like Copilot and Teams, which affects how agents are invoked and where their answers appear. This cross-product visibility matters because agents often operate across several collaboration surfaces, not just in SharePoint sites. Consequently, administrators benefit from a more holistic perspective when evaluating the agent ecosystem. However, integrating data from multiple systems introduces complexity for both reporting and governance.
One of the video’s central themes is governance, and Corey discusses how the new report supports compliance and audit needs by documenting agent actions. He explains that the added oversight helps organizations enforce policies and trace the source of automated responses. Nevertheless, the introduction of detailed logs also creates tradeoffs between transparency and administrative burden. For example, collecting and reviewing more data requires new processes, and organizations must decide how much monitoring is practical and proportional.
Alongside governance, Corey touches on privacy implications, noting that agent activity often involves content access and summary generation. Administrators must therefore weigh the benefit of agent-driven productivity against the need to protect sensitive data. In practice, this means applying appropriate access controls, monitoring agent scopes, and using the report to identify risky patterns. As a result, responsible adoption of agents requires both technical controls and organizational policies.
Corey frames agents as productivity enhancers, pointing to features like automated summaries and smarter search that reduce time spent finding answers. He also notes how agents can surface specialized expertise within a site, effectively turning content into interactive micro-experts. While these outcomes increase efficiency, they also change how people collaborate and edit content, sometimes reducing manual curation. Therefore, teams should balance automation with human oversight to preserve content quality.
Furthermore, the video acknowledges that integrating agents with collaborative tools like Teams can streamline workflows but can also blur accountability for information. When agents supply answers in multiple places, it becomes harder to track provenance and update the underlying documents. Consequently, organizations must plan for processes that maintain single sources of truth and ensure agents reference current, approved content. In short, integration delivers gains but requires deliberate management.
Corey concludes by recommending that administrators start with inventorying agents and using the report to prioritize where to focus governance efforts. He suggests incremental approaches, such as testing agent behavior on pilot sites before broad deployment. By doing so, teams can learn which agent configurations deliver value while limiting unintended effects on privacy or content quality. This iterative strategy helps organizations adopt agents responsibly without overwhelming IT or business stakeholders.
Finally, the video makes it clear that the new reporting tools are not a silver bullet; they are one part of a larger strategy that includes policy, training, and process change. Administrators will need to combine the report’s data with user education and clear decision-making rules to get the best outcomes. Ultimately, the SharePoint Agent Insights report provides practical visibility, but effective governance depends on how organizations act on those insights. As adoption grows, continuing to refine both technical controls and operational practices will be essential.
SharePoint agent report, SharePoint agent detection, SharePoint activity report, SharePoint audit and compliance, detect SharePoint clients, SharePoint usage analytics, SharePoint security monitoring, SharePoint reporting tool