Microsoft Fabric licensing: F SKUs, Power BI and Copilot
Microsoft Fabric

Microsoft Fabric licensing: F SKUs, Power BI and Copilot

by HubSite 365 about Reza Rad (RADACAD) [MVP]

Founder | CEO @ RADACAD | Coach | Power BI Consultant | Author | Speaker | Regional Director | MVP

Fabric admins can compare F SKU capacity, per-user licenses, reservations and Copilot requirements before planning costs.

Key insights

  • Fabric costs combine capacity, per-user licenses and OneLake storage.
  • The description lists F2 at $263 monthly pay-as-you-go and $156 with a one-year reservation.
  • F64 is the threshold identified for Power BI viewers to use Free licenses; authors still need Pro or PPU.
  • The description says Copilot requires a paid F2 or larger, not Pro, PPU or a trial.
  • OneLake storage is listed at $0.023 per GB per month, separately from capacity.

Microsoft Fabric licensing combines F SKU capacity, Power BI per-user licenses and OneLake storage, so the right choice depends on workload usage and who creates or views reports. This matters to Fabric and Power BI administrators, capacity owners, BI managers and architects planning spend or access. Reza Rad (RADACAD) [MVP] demonstrates the licensing considerations and cost comparisons in a YouTube video.

What's new

The licensing decisions covered here are not just a choice between one capacity size and another. The supplied material describes three cost components: Fabric capacity, user licenses such as Free, Pro and Premium Per User (PPU), and OneLake storage, billed separately. Capacity is measured in Capacity Units (CUs) and bought in F SKUs.

The description gives US list-price examples: pay-as-you-go F2 at $263 a month and F64 at $8,410 a month; with a one-year reservation, it lists F2 at $156 and F64 at $5,003 a month. It gives pay-as-you-go as $0.18 per CU-hour and estimates that reservations break even at roughly 59% of the month, or about 14 hours a day. These are examples from the supplied description, not a quote for every region or workload.

F64 is a key Power BI licensing threshold in the material. It says Free users can view Power BI content on F64 and larger capacity, while report authors still need Pro or PPU. The same description compares an F64 reservation with Pro licenses, estimating a break-even point at about 358 viewers; for pay-as-you-go F64, it says about 601 viewers. Treat those figures as scenario estimates, not universal purchasing advice.

The material also calls out features and changes relevant to planning: Copilot and data agents, Mirroring, the announced F0 capacity, and Fabric Apps. It says Mirroring replication compute is free and includes 1 TB of free mirrored storage for each CU purchased. Fabric Apps are described as being in preview, with Pro and PPU access announced.

Who it is for and what you need

Capacity owners and admins need to estimate demand and decide whether capacity should run continuously, scale, or pause. BI managers also need to distinguish report authors from viewers: capacity does not automatically remove individual licensing needs. The material says authors still require Pro or PPU even where F64 or larger allows Free viewers.

The available price examples are US list prices. The description warns that prices vary by region and recommends checking Azure pricing before making a decision. It does not give a complete regional price table, a full SKU-by-SKU comparison, or detailed terms for every license. It also does not specify tenant, geography or rollout conditions for the features it discusses.

For Copilot, the supplied description states that a paid F2 or larger is required; a Pro license, PPU license or trial alone does not meet that stated capacity requirement. It does not provide further eligibility details or identify all regional and tenant prerequisites. F0 is described as announced, with no price published in the material, so it is not possible to compare its costs here.

How it works

Start by separating costs into capacity, people and storage. Capacity supports Fabric workloads; per-user licenses affect what people can do in Power BI; OneLake storage is a separate charge. The supplied material also describes Fabric as covering workloads including Lakehouse, Warehouse, data engineering, data science, Real-Time Intelligence and Power BI.

  1. Estimate the workload pattern. Decide whether the capacity is needed continuously or whether it can be scaled down or paused during idle periods. The description’s example uses F8 during the day and F2 at night, estimating about $497 monthly, roughly 53% less than running F8 around the clock.
  2. Compare payment models. Use the listed pay-as-you-go rate for flexible or variable use, and compare a reservation for capacity expected to run steadily. The description recommends reserving an always-on base and using pay-as-you-go for development, test and spiky workloads.
  3. Map users to their tasks. Identify report authors and publishers separately from viewers. The stated rule is that authors need Pro or PPU, while Free viewers can consume Power BI content at F64 or larger, subject to applicable conditions not detailed in the supplied material.
  4. Check feature requirements and storage. For Copilot, the stated requirement is a paid F2 or larger. Include OneLake storage in the budget rather than assuming it is part of the capacity price. For Mirroring, the description says replication compute is free and describes 1 TB of free mirrored storage per CU.
  5. Compare the estimates with current pricing. Prices in the description are US list-price examples and may vary by region. Verify the applicable Azure price before committing; no official Microsoft pricing URL was included in the available sources for this article.

The video description also recommends sizing capacity for average load rather than peak demand, and notes that throttling applies per capacity. In its example, an overloaded development capacity does not affect production. It mentions bursting and smoothing but does not provide enough detail here to explain thresholds or administration controls.

Limitations and open questions

These figures are planning examples, not a full price calculator. Actual costs depend on region and capacity use, and the source material does not give a complete pricing schedule or detailed reservation terms. The estimated viewer break-even counts likewise depend on the stated price assumptions and should not be applied without checking the organization’s own license and usage costs.

F0 has no price in the supplied description. Fabric Apps are identified as preview, but the description does not specify rollout timing, availability conditions or the exact capabilities included. It also does not give step-by-step instructions for buying a capacity, setting up a reservation, scaling automatically, or changing license assignments.

The supplied research notes refer to official Microsoft materials, but no corresponding official Microsoft URLs appear in the permitted source list. For that reason, this article does not add independent claims about current availability, detailed licensing rules or rollout. The linked demonstration is the available source for the specific figures and statements summarized here.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

Do Power BI viewers need a paid license on Fabric capacity?

The supplied description identifies F64 and larger as the threshold where Free users can view Power BI content. It says authors still need Pro or PPU; other conditions are not detailed.

How much does Microsoft Fabric F2 cost?

The description lists US prices of $263 per month pay-as-you-go and $156 per month with a one-year reservation. Prices vary by region, so check applicable Azure pricing.

What Fabric capacity is required for Copilot?

The supplied description says Copilot needs a paid F2 or larger, and that Pro, PPU or the trial alone is not enough. Other eligibility details are not provided.

Is Fabric Apps available, and what does F0 cost?

The description says Fabric Apps are in preview and that Pro and PPU access was announced. It says F0 was announced but its price had not been published in the material.