SharePoint Approvals - No Power Automate

Key insights

• Built-in SharePoint approval: Use the modern document library Request Sign-Off command to send a file for approval without building a flow.
  SharePoint records the result as the document’s Sign-off status.
• How it works: Select a document, choose Automate > Request Sign-Off, add approver names and a message, then submit.
  Approvers get an email and can approve, reject, or re-assign.
• Benefits: No setup in Power Automate for simple sign-offs, easy for end users, and approvers can act from email or the Approvals app.
  Status updates appear directly in the library.
• Key limits: Approvers must have access to open the file from the request.
  If you add multiple approvers, any one of them can complete the sign-off.
  If the library has Require Check Out enabled, the command is unavailable until checkout.
• When Power Automate is needed: Use Power Automate for multiple stages, custom routing, list item approvals, or complex approver rules that the built-in sign-off can’t handle.
• Practical recommendation: Use Request Sign-Off for quick, document-only approvals to avoid extra tooling.
  If you need a step-by-step 2026 setup or troubleshooting tips, I can provide a concise guide for the modern library UI.

Video Summary

SharePoint Maven Inc. published a concise YouTube video that demonstrates how to use SharePoint’s built‑in approval feature without creating a custom workflow in Power Automate. In the video, the presenter walks through the modern document library interface and shows how to trigger the Request Sign‑Off command, add approvers, and observe the approval result. Overall, the piece frames this as a lightweight, native option for straightforward document sign‑off scenarios and points out where it differs from more advanced automation tools.

How the Built-in Approval Works

The video explains that a user selects a document, opens the menu, and navigates to Automate > Request Sign‑Off to start the process. The requester types approver names and an optional message, then submits the request so approvers receive an email with options to approve, reject, or reassign. After an approver acts, SharePoint writes the result back to the library as Sign‑off status, which makes the outcome visible to other users and administrators.

• Select document and choose Request Sign‑Off.
• Enter approvers and submit the request.
• Approver responds via email or the Approvals app and SharePoint updates status.

Benefits and Practical Uses

First, the video highlights that this method avoids building a dedicated flow in Power Automate, which saves time for simple tasks and lowers the barrier for non‑technical users. Consequently, teams that only need a single approver or occasional sign‑offs can adopt this pattern with minimal training and no extra licensing concerns. Moreover, approvers may act directly from an email or through the Teams Approvals app, which keeps the process familiar and accessible across platforms.

Second, the presenter notes that the native experience keeps metadata synchronized because the approval decision writes to the library item, improving traceability. Therefore, organizations can use the sign‑off status for filtering, views, and simple governance without writing custom logic. However, the video suggests using this approach only when requirements stay simple, since it trades advanced control for convenience.

Limitations and Tradeoffs

The video responsibly calls out several constraints that matter to teams planning governance or complex workflows. For example, if you name multiple approvers, the current behavior treats any single approval as sufficient, which can undercut expectations for unanimous or sequential approvals. In addition, an approver must have access to the library or the shared document to open it from the approval request; otherwise, they may be unable to review the file, which creates an access‑management challenge.

Another practical constraint is that certain library settings, such as Require Check Out, disable the command until the document is checked out, and Microsoft documents that broader multi‑approver engines are not part of SharePoint Online’s general out‑of‑the‑box feature set. Therefore, teams must balance the convenience of a native tool against the need for precise routing, multi‑stage approvals, or bespoke notification logic. As the video notes, those advanced scenarios usually push organizations toward Power Automate.

When to Choose Power Automate

The presenter contrasts the built‑in option with Power Automate, explaining that Power Automate supports complex conditions, multiple approver patterns, and list‑item workflows that SharePoint’s sign‑off does not. Consequently, if your process requires stage gating, conditional routing, parallel approvals with consensus, or integration with external systems, Power Automate remains the practical choice. The tradeoff is that Power Automate flows require design, testing, and often ongoing maintenance, which increases project effort and governance needs.

Moreover, implementing flows introduces dependency on flow ownership and monitoring, so teams must plan for change management and failover if a flow owner leaves. Therefore, the decision becomes a question of risk versus convenience: adopt the native feature for simple sign‑offs to reduce complexity, or invest in flows when rules and auditability demand it. The video’s guidance helps viewers weigh these factors rather than recommending one path for all cases.

Bottom Line for IT Pros and Business Users

Ultimately, SharePoint Maven Inc.’s video presents a clear, practical walkthrough that will help many teams save time on routine approvals while remaining honest about limits. For quick, document‑centric approvals where one yes from any approver suffices, the Request Sign‑Off path delivers an efficient experience that integrates with email and Teams. However, for organizations that require strict approval sequences, consensus, or extended automation, the video suggests using Power Automate and planning for the additional design and maintenance work that entails.

In short, the YouTube demonstration serves as a helpful decision aid: adopt the built‑in capability when simplicity and speed matter, and choose a flow‑based approach when control and complexity drive your requirements. IT teams should therefore map their business needs to these tradeoffs before standardizing on one approach.

Keywords

SharePoint approvals OOTB, Configure SharePoint approvals, Built-in SharePoint approval workflow, SharePoint approvals without Power Automate, SharePoint Online approval setup, SharePoint list approval tutorial, Out-of-the-box SharePoint approvals, Configure approval process in SharePoint