Nick Ross [MVP] (T-Minus365) published a concise you_tube_video that highlights five often-overlooked security controls in Microsoft Entra. In the clip, he explains how these settings, which are available in common plans like Business Premium, can raise an organization’s identity security without large platform changes. Consequently, the video serves as a practical checklist for busy admins who want immediate gains.
For newsroom readers, this article summarizes the key points, explains the tradeoffs, and explores the operational challenges. Moreover, it frames each recommendation in terms of why it matters and what to watch for when changing policies. The aim is to present clear, actionable context rather than a step-by-step tutorial.
First, Ross emphasizes the value of Custom Banned Passwords, a setting that lets organizations add company-specific weak passwords to a denied list. By doing so, teams can stop users from choosing easy-to-guess phrases tied to the company name or common patterns, which reduces credential compromise risks. However, administrators must balance strictness with usability since overly restrictive lists can frustrate users and increase helpdesk resets.
Next, he recommends restricting access to the Entra Admin Center through Conditional Access rules to lower the attack surface. This measure helps prevent threat actors from targeting admin consoles directly, but it requires careful scoping of who can sign in and from where. Therefore, IT teams need a rollback plan and staged deployment to avoid accidentally locking out legitimate administrators during incidents.
Ross shows an approach to require managed devices for sensitive access without committing fully to a single endpoint management solution. Essentially, organizations can enforce device compliance by integrating existing management tools and conditional access rather than migrating every device to Intune overnight. This hybrid approach provides immediate protection for critical resources while buying time to plan a complete device management strategy.
Nevertheless, this compromise introduces complexity because mixed management systems often produce inconsistent device signals. As a result, admins must verify device compliance telemetry and handle exceptions thoughtfully, since false negatives can block work and false positives can weaken security. In short, the method can work well, but it demands ongoing monitoring and coordination between identity and endpoint teams.
Another key topic is the risk around user consent and app registrations, which Ross warns can silently grant broad permissions to third-party apps. He suggests proactively blocking or limiting user consent to reduce the chance of excessive privileges being granted to malign applications. At the same time, organizations must decide how much autonomy to reserve for users versus centralized IT control, balancing security with productivity.
Implementing tighter consent controls can slow legitimate business workflows, so policy owners need to document exceptions and streamline safe app approvals. Furthermore, teams should monitor app registrations and periodically review granted permissions to catch drift. Consequently, a clear governance process paired with automated alerts offers the best compromise between security and user experience.
Finally, the you_tube_video covers Global Secure Access and new Entra capabilities for non-human identities, such as the Microsoft Entra Agent ID for AI agents. These features aim to prevent token theft and apply lifecycle controls to bots and AI services, extending conventional identity protections to automated actors. As organizations increasingly rely on AI, treating agents like users becomes essential to maintain least privilege and traceability.
However, configuring identity controls for AI introduces fresh challenges in credentials management and auditing. Teams must ensure agents receive only necessary access and rotate secrets or adopt certificate-based authentication where possible. Thus, operational discipline and clear naming conventions help reduce risk while enabling secure automation.
Across all five settings, the recurring theme is tradeoffs: tighter controls typically improve security but can disrupt workflows. Therefore, administrators should adopt a phased approach with monitoring, stakeholder communication, and easy rollback options to limit unintended consequences. Additionally, teams must invest in telemetry and reporting to validate that changes actually reduce risk without harming productivity.
In conclusion, Nick Ross’s video provides a compact, practical roadmap for improving Microsoft 365 identity security using features many organizations already have. By weighing usability against protection and by preparing for the operational work these controls require, IT teams can make targeted improvements that materially reduce exposure. Ultimately, the guidance invites administrators to act deliberately, test policies in stages, and keep both users and security goals in balance.
Microsoft Entra security features, Entra conditional access tips, Entra Privileged Identity Management guide, Entra Identity Protection best practices, Microsoft Entra multi-factor authentication, Entra entitlement management explained, Entra permission management strategies, Microsoft Entra cross-tenant access settings