Data Analytics
  • All of Microsoft
  • Python
  • My Role
    • All in My Role
    • Data Analytics
  • Focus
    • All in Focus
    • Microsoft Build 2026
    • Microsoft Fabric
    • What's Hot
    • M365 Release
  • Security & Identity
Timespan
explore our new search
Microsoft Fabric agentic development: five lessons
Microsoft Fabric

Microsoft Fabric agentic development: five lessons

by HubSite 365 about Will Needham (Learn Microsoft Fabric with Will)

Data Strategist & YouTuber

A six-month Fabric project points to five practices for agentic development, including building a project wiki before the project itself.

Key insights

  • The approach puts wiki development before project development.
  • The Agent Gym pre-training phase lasted about a month and involved roughly 100 tasks.
  • A planning skill matches project requirements against capabilities documented in the wiki.
  • The five lessons cover LLMs, specifications, taste, wiki development, and process.

Microsoft Fabric agentic development can benefit from a staged process that builds project knowledge before asking agents to implement the project. That approach is relevant to Fabric developers and data teams exploring how to use agents in their development work. Will Needham (Learn Microsoft Fabric with Will) describes lessons from six months of agentic Fabric development and rebuilding his platform three times.

What it does

The core idea is to treat the knowledge an agent uses as part of the engineering work, not as a byproduct of coding. In the approach described, work on an LLM wiki comes before development on the Fabric project. The wiki holds proven capabilities that a planning skill can compare with the requirements of a new project.

The source groups the experience into five lessons: LLMs, specifications, taste, wiki, and process. It does not provide enough detail in the supplied description to define each lesson as a formal method or prescribe a particular Fabric architecture. The clearest specifics concern the wiki, its preparation, and the controlled process for agentic development.

Who it is for and what you need

This is aimed at people developing Microsoft Fabric platforms with an agentic-first approach, including developers and technical teams deciding how to organize agent-assisted project work. The material does not specify a Fabric license, capacity, tenant setting, region, or minimum software version.

The described preparation phase, called the Agent Gym, lasted about a month and involved roughly 100 tasks. The description does not explain what those tasks were, how they were evaluated, or what infrastructure was needed. It also does not identify a rollout stage or claim that the method is a Microsoft product feature.

Two linked resources provide context for readers who want to explore the method and deployment practices further: the GSD Core project and Microsoft's Fabric CI/CD deployment guidance. Their inclusion does not establish that either resource is required for the process.

How it works

The material suggests an order of work rather than a menu-based Fabric procedure. It starts with developing the wiki, then uses that knowledge to inform planning and project implementation. The sequence is intended to make the agent's work draw on capabilities already captured in the knowledge base.

  1. Develop the wiki first. Build a collection of capabilities that have been established through prior work. The description presents wiki development as preceding project development.
  2. Run preparation tasks. The Agent Gym phase took about a month and covered approximately 100 tasks. The source does not give a task list or an exact completion test.
  3. Match requirements to known capabilities. A planning skill compares project requirements with capabilities recorded in the wiki. This provides a bridge between what the project needs and what the knowledge base already documents.
  4. Use a controlled agentic process. The publisher identifies the controlled development process as a central lesson. The available description does not spell out its controls or implementation steps, so teams would need to define those for their own work.

The five lesson headings also signal areas to consider alongside the workflow: the role of LLMs, clear specifications, judgment or “taste,” the project wiki, and development process. The source names these themes but does not provide enough detail to turn them into separate checklists.

Limitations and open questions

The supplied material is a short video description rather than a full transcript, so it supports only a limited account of the approach. It does not explain how the wiki is structured, what counts as a proven capability, how the planning skill is implemented, or how agents are tested before changes are accepted. It also does not provide evidence about development speed, reliability, or outcomes from the rebuilds.

Do not read the five lessons as a Microsoft-endorsed Fabric blueprint or a set of product requirements. The references include GSD Core and Microsoft's deployment guidance, but the description does not say that either is mandatory or explain how they connect to the Agent Gym. Teams evaluating the idea can treat the wiki-first sequence as a practice to investigate, while validating implementation details against their own project needs.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

What are the five lessons from agentic Fabric development?

The source names LLMs, specifications, taste, wiki development, and process. It gives the most specific detail about building a wiki before project development.

What is the Agent Gym in the Fabric development approach?

It is described as a pre-training phase that lasted about a month and involved roughly 100 tasks. The supplied material does not explain its task list or evaluation method.

How does the planning skill use the project wiki?

It matches project requirements against capabilities documented in the wiki. The implementation details are not provided.

Do I need a specific Fabric license or setting?

The material does not specify a license, tenant setting, region, or product prerequisite for this approach.